ELT World Discussion Forum Index ELT World Discussion
This is a TEFL forum
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY 2 - Oil spill
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 15, 16, 17  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ELT World Discussion Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
David
Site Admin


Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 2460
Location: Turkey

PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 6:59 am    Post subject: CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY 2 - Oil spill Reply with quote

GOP Congressman Don Young says the Gulf oil spill is "not an environmental disaster.

http://www.dccc.org/page/s/youngfb
_________________
ELT World - Twitter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Englishexpertgibson
Captain


Joined: 13 Dec 2007
Posts: 313

PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 7:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

apparently, mr obama says it's been taken care of, but the locals of US coastal areas and the undersea species do not think so..could it be that obama's predecessor has bent the rules for oil companies and now we're seeing the results? should w bombings and some of his former administrators take an oath for this one?

one more question looms over this tragedy and the current consequences and that is; "are the oil prices to steadily rise up to the sky?"

cheers and beers rather than oil
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thelmadatter
ELT General


Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 984
Location: Mexico City

PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 2:11 pm    Post subject: spill Reply with quote

Supposedly, Obama had been briefed as to the nature of the spill, the technical issues surrounding its plugging and that it would probably spew oil for months.

I think if he had gone on TV to announce the same to the people, he could have avoided much of the political fallout he has gotten and will continue to get. I agree that there is only so much the feds can do about this spill, but keeping people informed is one thing that shows leadership.

I suppose he was hoping that the initial efforts would succeed so that he would not have to take a hit. Problem now is that the hit is much harder and continues to go on and on. As I mentioned on the Obama thread, as bad as this one is, its not the worst in history and other large spills over time have not done permanent damage. Im not saying this is nothing, after all it is near a heavily populated area and marshlands are notoriously delicate. We may see permanent damage from this spill.

Another major problem is the depth of this well. (addition: I just foung this article in Newsweek about this - http://services.newsweek.com/id/238620/output/print) The initial efforts failed in part because of it. The dome failed because methane and other elements were freezing inside, blocking the gizmo's ability to redirect the flow. All efforts have to be done robotically as humans cant go down that far. Another problem with the well's depth is that oil is not coming directly to the surface. With Ixtoc I and the Valdez, most oil was on the surface so we knew were it was and where it was going. We probably dont have that advantage here and staying submerged makes the oil vulnerable to deeper water currents. In other words, it might pop up in unexpected places.

But the real problem for the government, especially for the Dems, is that expectations have been lifted as to what the federal government can and should do. Criticism of Bush after Katrina sent the message that the President personally has responsibility for all major disasters, so fallout goes to him, whether or not it is warranted. This was not a good precedent. There ARE limits to what the government can do, especially in a crisis such as this spill. Now what should be done after the spill is over is another story and should not be tackled until this is over.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
shuize
ELT General


Joined: 21 Sep 2007
Posts: 597

PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 11:39 pm    Post subject: Re: spill Reply with quote

thelmadatter wrote:
But the real problem for the government, especially for the Dems, is that expectations have been lifted as to what the federal government can and should do. Criticism of Bush after Katrina sent the message that the President personally has responsibility for all major disasters, so fallout goes to him, whether or not it is warranted. This was not a good precedent. There ARE limits to what the government can do, especially in a crisis such as this spill. Now what should be done after the spill is over is another story and should not be tackled until this is over.


Not to mention Obama going on television just before the "top-kill" was attempted -- just in time to take credit if it'd been successful -- announcing that he takes full responsibility for ending the leak.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/7773215/Barack-Obama-takes-full-responsibility-for-ending-Gulf-of-Mexico-oil-flow.html
_________________
"Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership." -- Senator Barack Obama, 2006
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Englishexpertgibson
Captain


Joined: 13 Dec 2007
Posts: 313

PostPosted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

apparently, the gulf states federal judges had their interests in oil companies.

cheers and oil
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
eslforhire
Captain


Joined: 22 Feb 2010
Posts: 190

PostPosted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Englishexpertgibson wrote:
apparently, mr obama says it's been taken care of, but the locals of US coastal areas and the undersea species do not think so..could it be that obama's predecessor has bent the rules for oil companies and now we're seeing the results? should w bombings and some of his former administrators take an oath for this one?

one more question looms over this tragedy and the current consequences and that is; "are the oil prices to steadily rise up to the sky?"

cheers and beers rather than oil


9-11 happened 7 months and 23 days into Bush's presidency and it's his responsibility not Clinton's.

DWH happened 1 year, 3 months and 1 day into Obama's presidency and it's not his responsibility it's Bush's fault.

Hmmm. What is the pattern here?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Englishexpertgibson
Captain


Joined: 13 Dec 2007
Posts: 313

PostPosted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the bush clan's family business...clintons've been into other kinda affairs Wink

i see all these fine gulf judges eager the project kicked off. in any case, hasn't this been approved before obama's first day?

cheers and beers to the patterns and the royal american oil family Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shuize
ELT General


Joined: 21 Sep 2007
Posts: 597

PostPosted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 3:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Englishexpertgibson wrote:
in any case, hasn't this been approved before obama's first day?

Funny:

Quote:
It’s probably safe to assume that the Department of the Interior won’t be giving out any more awards soon to Transocean Ltd., owner of the offshore oil platform that blew up and sank in the Gulf of Mexico. Up until last summer at least, the Minerals Management Service (MMS) thought Transocean was doing a bang-up job, presenting the company with a regional Safety Award for Excellence (SAFE) for “outstanding drilling operations” and a “perfect performance period.”


http://www.allgov.com/ViewNews/Interior_Department_Gave_Deepwater_Horizon_Operators_Safety_Award_in_2009_100501
_________________
"Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership." -- Senator Barack Obama, 2006
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Englishexpertgibson
Captain


Joined: 13 Dec 2007
Posts: 313

PostPosted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sorry i haven't had enough time to read it all but does presenting awards mean they've done well before?
cheers and oil
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Englishexpertgibson
Captain


Joined: 13 Dec 2007
Posts: 313

PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 6:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

now, how would the current administration deal with claims from some cuban fishermen and resorts that it's just too oily there and so too difficult to survive?

cheers and oil
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
geaaronson
Captain


Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Posts: 415

PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 8:09 pm    Post subject: furthermore Reply with quote

Actually ELFOSHIRE, the CIA put out a contract on Bin Laden 7 days before 9/11. Read it for yourself, it was in Time Magazine, a conservative newsweekly.
Now a fanatically, despotic jerk in a faraway land has sleeper cells all over the world and guess what, we had just provoked him unnecessarily.
Make a fist at a snake and it will strike. That´s why we fault Bush. Cheney wanted a fight and he got one.
And yes, Obama was asleep at the switch on this one as well. Blame both Presidents for their ineptitude.
But it´s interesting with all you neo conservatives, point out a deficiency in your favorite politician and you automatically go in the attack mode.

Didn´t you guys ever have a proper upbringing.

Mommy, mommy he hit me.
Well why did he hit you?
I only called him a name.

By gosh, it is never a conservatives fault. He has received grace from God.
_________________
Geoffrey Ellis Aronson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
furiousmilksheikali
ELT General


Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Posts: 762

PostPosted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 12:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, by that token Clinton could be blamed for "shaking his fist at a snake" or provoking him "unnecessarily" by launching cruise missiles into the training camps in Afghanistan.

Of course, that wouldn't be the correct analysis as Osama bin Laden had already declared war on Americans with this:

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/terrorism/international/fatwa_1996.html

And had been responsible for the embassy bombings in Africa and the USS Cole.

It's probably understandable in those circumstances to put a contract out on bin Laden. Clinton had already set up the CIA's bin Laden unit, after all. Of course, why they haven't caught him since then is anyone's guess. They don't look like they've been trying very hard to catch him.

That job has been privatised:

http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/06/15/pakistan.us.detention/index.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ELT World Discussion Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 15, 16, 17  Next
Page 1 of 17

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group