 |
ELT World Discussion This is a TEFL forum
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
David Site Admin

Joined: 24 Aug 2007 Posts: 2460 Location: Turkey
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Englishexpertgibson Captain
Joined: 13 Dec 2007 Posts: 313
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 7:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
apparently, mr obama says it's been taken care of, but the locals of US coastal areas and the undersea species do not think so..could it be that obama's predecessor has bent the rules for oil companies and now we're seeing the results? should w bombings and some of his former administrators take an oath for this one?
one more question looms over this tragedy and the current consequences and that is; "are the oil prices to steadily rise up to the sky?"
cheers and beers rather than oil |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thelmadatter ELT General
Joined: 04 Oct 2007 Posts: 984 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 2:11 pm Post subject: spill |
|
|
Supposedly, Obama had been briefed as to the nature of the spill, the technical issues surrounding its plugging and that it would probably spew oil for months.
I think if he had gone on TV to announce the same to the people, he could have avoided much of the political fallout he has gotten and will continue to get. I agree that there is only so much the feds can do about this spill, but keeping people informed is one thing that shows leadership.
I suppose he was hoping that the initial efforts would succeed so that he would not have to take a hit. Problem now is that the hit is much harder and continues to go on and on. As I mentioned on the Obama thread, as bad as this one is, its not the worst in history and other large spills over time have not done permanent damage. Im not saying this is nothing, after all it is near a heavily populated area and marshlands are notoriously delicate. We may see permanent damage from this spill.
Another major problem is the depth of this well. (addition: I just foung this article in Newsweek about this - http://services.newsweek.com/id/238620/output/print) The initial efforts failed in part because of it. The dome failed because methane and other elements were freezing inside, blocking the gizmo's ability to redirect the flow. All efforts have to be done robotically as humans cant go down that far. Another problem with the well's depth is that oil is not coming directly to the surface. With Ixtoc I and the Valdez, most oil was on the surface so we knew were it was and where it was going. We probably dont have that advantage here and staying submerged makes the oil vulnerable to deeper water currents. In other words, it might pop up in unexpected places.
But the real problem for the government, especially for the Dems, is that expectations have been lifted as to what the federal government can and should do. Criticism of Bush after Katrina sent the message that the President personally has responsibility for all major disasters, so fallout goes to him, whether or not it is warranted. This was not a good precedent. There ARE limits to what the government can do, especially in a crisis such as this spill. Now what should be done after the spill is over is another story and should not be tackled until this is over. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shuize ELT General

Joined: 21 Sep 2007 Posts: 597
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 11:39 pm Post subject: Re: spill |
|
|
| thelmadatter wrote: | | But the real problem for the government, especially for the Dems, is that expectations have been lifted as to what the federal government can and should do. Criticism of Bush after Katrina sent the message that the President personally has responsibility for all major disasters, so fallout goes to him, whether or not it is warranted. This was not a good precedent. There ARE limits to what the government can do, especially in a crisis such as this spill. Now what should be done after the spill is over is another story and should not be tackled until this is over. |
Not to mention Obama going on television just before the "top-kill" was attempted -- just in time to take credit if it'd been successful -- announcing that he takes full responsibility for ending the leak.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/7773215/Barack-Obama-takes-full-responsibility-for-ending-Gulf-of-Mexico-oil-flow.html _________________ "Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership." -- Senator Barack Obama, 2006 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Englishexpertgibson Captain
Joined: 13 Dec 2007 Posts: 313
|
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
apparently, the gulf states federal judges had their interests in oil companies.
cheers and oil |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eslforhire Captain
Joined: 22 Feb 2010 Posts: 190
|
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Englishexpertgibson wrote: | apparently, mr obama says it's been taken care of, but the locals of US coastal areas and the undersea species do not think so..could it be that obama's predecessor has bent the rules for oil companies and now we're seeing the results? should w bombings and some of his former administrators take an oath for this one?
one more question looms over this tragedy and the current consequences and that is; "are the oil prices to steadily rise up to the sky?"
cheers and beers rather than oil |
9-11 happened 7 months and 23 days into Bush's presidency and it's his responsibility not Clinton's.
DWH happened 1 year, 3 months and 1 day into Obama's presidency and it's not his responsibility it's Bush's fault.
Hmmm. What is the pattern here? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Englishexpertgibson Captain
Joined: 13 Dec 2007 Posts: 313
|
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the bush clan's family business...clintons've been into other kinda affairs
i see all these fine gulf judges eager the project kicked off. in any case, hasn't this been approved before obama's first day?
cheers and beers to the patterns and the royal american oil family  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shuize ELT General

Joined: 21 Sep 2007 Posts: 597
|
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Englishexpertgibson wrote: | | in any case, hasn't this been approved before obama's first day? |
Funny:
| Quote: | | It’s probably safe to assume that the Department of the Interior won’t be giving out any more awards soon to Transocean Ltd., owner of the offshore oil platform that blew up and sank in the Gulf of Mexico. Up until last summer at least, the Minerals Management Service (MMS) thought Transocean was doing a bang-up job, presenting the company with a regional Safety Award for Excellence (SAFE) for “outstanding drilling operations” and a “perfect performance period.” |
http://www.allgov.com/ViewNews/Interior_Department_Gave_Deepwater_Horizon_Operators_Safety_Award_in_2009_100501 _________________ "Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership." -- Senator Barack Obama, 2006 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Englishexpertgibson Captain
Joined: 13 Dec 2007 Posts: 313
|
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
sorry i haven't had enough time to read it all but does presenting awards mean they've done well before?
cheers and oil |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Englishexpertgibson Captain
Joined: 13 Dec 2007 Posts: 313
|
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 6:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
now, how would the current administration deal with claims from some cuban fishermen and resorts that it's just too oily there and so too difficult to survive?
cheers and oil |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
geaaronson Captain
Joined: 19 Sep 2007 Posts: 415
|
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 8:09 pm Post subject: furthermore |
|
|
Actually ELFOSHIRE, the CIA put out a contract on Bin Laden 7 days before 9/11. Read it for yourself, it was in Time Magazine, a conservative newsweekly.
Now a fanatically, despotic jerk in a faraway land has sleeper cells all over the world and guess what, we had just provoked him unnecessarily.
Make a fist at a snake and it will strike. That´s why we fault Bush. Cheney wanted a fight and he got one.
And yes, Obama was asleep at the switch on this one as well. Blame both Presidents for their ineptitude.
But it´s interesting with all you neo conservatives, point out a deficiency in your favorite politician and you automatically go in the attack mode.
Didn´t you guys ever have a proper upbringing.
Mommy, mommy he hit me.
Well why did he hit you?
I only called him a name.
By gosh, it is never a conservatives fault. He has received grace from God. _________________ Geoffrey Ellis Aronson |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
furiousmilksheikali ELT General

Joined: 14 Sep 2007 Posts: 762
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, by that token Clinton could be blamed for "shaking his fist at a snake" or provoking him "unnecessarily" by launching cruise missiles into the training camps in Afghanistan.
Of course, that wouldn't be the correct analysis as Osama bin Laden had already declared war on Americans with this:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/terrorism/international/fatwa_1996.html
And had been responsible for the embassy bombings in Africa and the USS Cole.
It's probably understandable in those circumstances to put a contract out on bin Laden. Clinton had already set up the CIA's bin Laden unit, after all. Of course, why they haven't caught him since then is anyone's guess. They don't look like they've been trying very hard to catch him.
That job has been privatised:
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/06/15/pakistan.us.detention/index.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|